A Myth (n.) holds no life for us: only the myth lives in the myth.
A Myth (n.) cannot hold itself up without a ritual to support — and psychoanalysis is not the ritual of Oedipus.
A Myth (n.) does not express the earth but the conditions under which the earth fades before the despot; tragedy expresses the despot fading before the city-state.
A Myth (n.) in Plato does not interrupt division but completes it: it is the story of a foundation, building the model by which pretenders are judged.
A Myth (n.) is not reconquered by going back; one encounters it anew when time quakes at its foundations.
A Myth (n.) in Plato is the story-repetition of a foundation: a circle that turns and returns, allotting lots, giving division a ground on which to measure claims.
A Myth (n.) does not express or invert real relations; it conditions — only myth can determine the intensive conditions of a system in conformity with indigenous thought and practice.
A Myth (n.) among the Dogon amounts to a mythical Weismannism: the son, sharing the placenta's substance, is his mother's twin — myth and science saying the same thing from a great distance.
A Myth (n.) is taken as the measure of the unconscious without anyone asking why: Jung reads it upward to restore religiosity, Freud downward to confirm his atheism — both inject the religious into the unconscious.