Arithmetic (n.) would end if beans, sticks and fingers kept vanishing or multiplying when counted; 2 + 2 = 4 would become unusable.
Arithmetic (n.) survives miscounted apples: if two and two make three, I say not that 2 + 2 is sometimes 3, but that one must have gone.
An Arithmetic (n.) al proposition (n.) would become useless, not false, if confusion came; its sense, not its truth, rests on the regular working of measurement.
Arithmetic (n.) is pictured as the natural history, the mineralogy, of numbers — an idea that penetrates our whole thinking.
An Arithmetic (n.) al truth (n.) like 4 + 1 = 5 is over-determined: the result is defined to be the criterion that the operation was carried out.
An Arithmetic (n.) al proposition (n.) is an empirical proposition hardened into a rule, no longer tested by experience but used to judge it.
Arithmetic (n.) equating 625 and 25 × 25 is a grammatical trick that bars one kind of description and steers description into other channels.
Arithmetic (n.) suggests a process sunk beneath the mirror surface of water.
Arithmetic (n.) is perhaps the one regular use of imagination in everyday life.
Arithmetic (n.) understood in primary school would require children to be important philosophers; failing that, they need practice.
Arithmetic (n.) is the grammar of numbers; kinds of number differ only by the arithmetical rules for them.
Arithmetic (n.) does not talk about numbers, it works with them, and is its own application.
Arithmetic (n.) is a kind of geometry, calculations on paper as geometry has constructions, and chess might be too.
Arithmetic (n.) is like a knife made without deciding what it will cut; its application will show soon enough.
Arithmetic (n.) is its own application, hence the aversion to grounding it in anything said about its use.
Arithmetic (n.) operates with the strokes on paper; it does not talk about them.