Sense (n.) is not found in a phrase but given to it: talk of where thought takes place has sense if we give it sense.
Sense (n.) turns into a shadowy being because two sentences in different languages can share it, one of many such beings we invent for nouns with no material object.
Sense (n.) pictured as something in the mind behind what we say is the worst enemy of our understanding here.
Sense (n.) is pictured as something that runs alongside the sentence, and we do not get free of that idea.
Sense (n.) may be called a proposition's purpose, though the natural history of word use is no concern of logic.
Sense (n.) is not decided by experience, which decides only a proposition's truth or falsity.
Sense (n.) and nonsense are where one must begin: nothing comes before that distinction, and it cannot be given a foundation.
Sense (n.) is a sentence's role in the calculus.
Sense (n.) is nothing spiritual and not a soul, but what is given in answer to a request for an explanation of the sense.
Sense (n.) is a proposition's two poles: the case of its truth and the case of its falsehood.
Sense (n.) and meaning of a proposition are not things; both words are incomplete symbols.