Interpretation (n.) is often an act we invent after the fact: we say he 'interpreted banjo as string instrument' and imagine a definite inner act besides the act of choosing.
Interpretation (n.) is never the last word: whenever we interpret a symbol, the interpretation is just a new symbol added to the old one — an arrow could always be read the opposite way.
Interpretation (n.) comes to an end.
Interpretation (n.) can make anything count as following a rule — but that everything can be so interpreted does not mean everything is following.
Interpretation (n.) is a conjecture that may turn out false; I see this figure as an F can no more be verified than I see a luminous red.
Interpretation (n.) is not an indirect description of what is seen in a figure; it is the primary expression of the experience.
An Interpretation (n.) is a thought; seeing a figure under one is a kind of thinking of it.
Interpretation (n.) is thinking, doing something; seeing is not.
Interpretation (n.) used in seeing something does not mean that one experiences an interpretation.
Interpretation (n.) is a kind of thinking that often brings on a sudden change of aspect; it is as if one saw an interpretation.
Interpretation (n.) by further signs would be like settling what a coin toss is worth by tossing again.
Interpretation (n.) stops not because the symbol cannot be read further, but because I feel at home in the picture and do no interpreting.
Interpretation (n.) is not done every time we understand a sign; a knife whipped out is not interpreted as a threat.
Interpretation (n.) is not something accompanying an image but the path on which it lies.