Memory (n.) cannot be demonstrated like a tingle: no one could say now I have experienced what remembering is — we experience nothing special.
Memory (n.) is not a trace in the nerves; the dictaphone spool changed by a voice does not remember what was said.
Memory (n.) is like instantaneous understanding or decision: one can remember a situation in a moment.
Memory (n.) need leave no trace stored in the nerves; if that upsets our concepts of causality, it is high time they were upset.
A Memory (n.) image (n.) is not evidence of the past like an old photograph; memory-image and memory-words stand on the same level.
Memory (n.) does not show us the past, any more than our senses show us the present.
Memory (n.) could not communicate the past even as a voice, for how would we learn from it what yesterday means?
Memory (n.) and reality must be in one space, as image and reality are.
Memory (n.) is either a fading picture of a physical event or the source of time itself, two legitimate ways of talking that must not be mixed.