The Living being (n.) is not a result of individuation but a theater for it: it keeps individuating itself for as long as it lives.
The Living being (n.) is a crystal that kept receiving news: one message makes a crystal, several messages that have to be reconciled make a life.
A Living being (n.) lives on its limit: not inside its skin, but at the border where inside and outside are kept apart.
A Living being (n.) is a crystal that never stops forming: it keeps the tension between itself and its surroundings alive instead of settling it.
A Living being (n.) is a pair of opposites held in tune by a third power that plays one against the other like instruments.
The Living being (n.) is contemporaneous with itself in every part, whereas the physical individual drags a dead past inside it.
The Living being (n.) is a problem that has not solved itself: more than a unit, less than a world.
The Living being (n.) carries its maker inside it; a brick walks away from its mold and its mason and leaves both behind.
A Living being (n.) never finishes settling: it keeps a little unspent tension, a live line between the largest and smallest scales of its own reality.
A Living being (n.) is itself a modulator: it carries its own power supply, memory and effectors, while a physical individual borrows all three from its surroundings.
A Living being (n.) differs from a crystal by remembering at its edge: everything it has produced is as present at its limit as the newest thing.
The Living being (n.) hunts the optimal zone in every gradient: it judges both directions from where it stands.
A Living being (n.) is an autokinetic system: it acts on its own before meeting anything, and that spontaneity sets off the cycle of the image, which ends in invention.
The Living being (n.) is that in which content becomes code: its experience overlaps itself and is used to read new experience, whereas in a machine the code and the content stay apart as condition and conditioned.
The Living being (n.) needs information, while the machine essentially uses forms and is made of them: that gap, not a likeness of bodies, is the true difference between man and machine.
The Living being (n.) is concrete from its first day; the machine is only ever on its way there.
The Living being (n.) can invent because it carries its own associated milieu around with it.
The Living being (n.) is not just the outcome of individuation, like a molecule, but the theater where individuation keeps playing.
The Living being (n.) is both more and less than one: it carries a problem inside itself and is also a piece of somebody else's larger problem.
The Living being (n.) is a knot of information sending messages through itself — a system inside a system, brokering between two scales.