Dialectic (n.) is problematic because, while the real does contradict itself, there is no ultimate reconciliation rather, the real solves its own contradiction by displacing or detouring the contradiction.
The Dialectic (n.) of Hegel still moves between two full presences, governed by a horizon of presence.
Dialectic (n.) only ever repeats the aporia by affirming it, turning time into the affirmation of the aporetic.
Dialectic (n.) never reaches its final fulfilment, because the god of writing mimics it and endlessly defers it.
Dialectic (n.) supplements and replaces the forbidden intuition of the father's face, as Socrates replaces the father.
Dialectic (n.) is at most mimed: to deny what is, and explain what is not, cannot be reduced to a dialectical operation.