Madness (n.) as unreason has been dislocated, and a liberation of madness has begun as psychiatry opens.
Madness (n.) is the deciding gesture that detaches a meaningful language from background noise, and so is linked to the possibility of history.
Madness (n.) is what by essence cannot be said: it is the absence of a work.
Madness (n.) has a silence that cannot be said within the logos of a book about it; only its pathos makes it present.
Madness (n.) is today a false and disintegrated concept, lagging behind its own subversion by science and philosophy.
Madness (n.) as Foucault intends it overlaps everything that can be put under the rubric of negativity.
Madness (n.) is never mad enough to make a good example of doubt: the madman is not always wrong about everything.
Madness (n.) is impossible not for the object of thought but for the thinking subject.
Madness (n.) is expelled from the very interiority of thought, rejected in its very impossibility.
Madness (n.) is, in every sense of the word, only one case of thought, within thought.
Madness (n.) is a concept that solidifies only in the era when the subject is taken as proper to himself.
Madness (n.) is as much alienation as inalienation: it is the work, or the absence of the work.
Madness (n.) is never excluded in principle, only in fact, violently, in history; the gap between fact and principle is history itself.
Madness (n.) is undone by the same destruction that undoes the work and the book, but not the text.