Intervention (n.) in the Third World aims not at the left but at independence, of whatever ideology, since every region has an assigned function in the global system.
Intervention (n.) claimed as a right is by nature reserved for the most powerful states — a policy of force that may pervert justice itself.
Intervention (n.) defends a country's national independence, by Orwellian logic, by protecting its ruling elite from its own insurgents.
Intervention (n.) is a policy of force, the World Court ruled in 1949, and by its nature belongs only to the most powerful states.
Intervention (n.) is wrongful, the World Court ruled, whenever it coerces a people's sovereign choice of political, economic and social system.
Intervention (n.) is demanded where nothing can be done, against the official enemy; where our own support makes a massacre possible, and stopping it would be easy, nobody calls for it.
An Intervention (n.) may have to be sold as a fight against the old enemy, even when the old enemy is not the one in the field.
Intervention (n.) runs in a cycle: dislike of the invaders, small disobedience, a forceful response, more resistance, and escalation until the invaders leave or approach genocide.