The Intellectual (n.) is tasked with speaking truth to power and exposing lies.
The Intellectual (n.) is in a position to expose the lies of governments, to analyze actions according to their causes and motives and often hidden intentions.
The Intellectual (n.) is, given his unusual privilege, realistically able to accomplish a great deal. The limits are imposed by will more than objective circumstances. And about human will predictions are without value.
The Intellectual (n.) is the one who writes history.
An Intellectual (n.) in the class sense belongs to a secular priesthood whose task is to uphold a society's doctrinal truths — and distrusting him is healthy.
Intellectual (n.) is a specialist in defamation, a commissar of the ideological order, and the first to feel threatened by dissent.
Intellectual (n.) in the serious sense is often an activist — like the SNCC organizers who thought hard about problems and changed the world.
The Intellectual (n.) earns admission to respectable society chiefly by failing to perceive that there might be some slight problem with his own state's conduct.
The Intellectual (n.) took credit in 1917 for leading a pacifist population into war — and drew the lesson that human affairs can be taken hold of and managed.
Intellectual (n.) will defend their institutions, as history teaches, above all against one thing: analysis of how they serve power.
The Intellectual (n.) who is properly trained learns the new lines with almost no effort at all.
Intellectual (n.) will tend, if ideology is generally a mask for self-interest, to distrust popular movements and insist that society be managed by those who know, that is, by himself.
Intellectual (n.) rising to power were, for the ultra-left, a new and more efficient form of exploitation; for the Western sociologist, the hope of a humane society run by piecemeal technology.
Intellectual (n.) make simple things look difficult, as the medieval church made mysteries, to keep the common people subordinate and themselves important.
Intellectual (n.) properly understood is a servant working with others toward better understanding — no vanguard at all.
Intellectual (n.) are the only people who fail to understand simple political truths — they have a vested interest in not understanding, since understanding would cost them power.
Intellectual (n.) who truly defies power today is more likely found in Turkey or Colombia, facing prison or assassination, than in the West — a fact that should shame Western counterparts.
The Intellectual (n.) was born, in the modern sense, as an insult: a writer who presumes to judge generals and institutions.
The Intellectual (n.) in wartime tends to call his enlistment a moral verdict reached after the utmost deliberation.