The Free press (n.) imagines itself a cantankerous watchdog the powerful must suffer; in practice it inculcates the agenda of those who own the economy.
A Free press (n.) shows its balance by splitting evenly between hawks, who want more terror, and doves, who doubt the terror is working.
The Free press (n.) cannot be reformed abuse by abuse, John Dewey argued; the real question is how far intellectual freedom is possible at all under the existing economic regime.
A Free press (n.) has one duty in the eyes of its loudest critics: to cheer for the home team.
The Free press (n.) is supposed, by the democratic postulate, to discover and report the truth; but if the powerful can fix the premises of discourse and decide what the populace may see, hear and think about, the postulate is at odds with reality.
Free press (n.) must, by its loudest critics' standard, accept the state's doctrine and also be more optimistic about the war than the generals and the CIA.
Free press (n.) follows democratization rather than leading it: only as people organize and educate themselves in community and workplace can media become free and independent.
A Free press (n.) must never, by Freedom House standards, describe the enemy as tough or courageous — offering by choice the service totalitarian states extract by force.
Free press (n.) keeps up the elaborate pretense of being a critical, dissenting force — even too critical for democracy — while serving the state's basic principles almost entirely.