The State (n.) has one primary enemy, whatever state it is: its own population.
State (n.) is not a moral agent but a vehicle of power, acting for whoever holds power inside it; anyone who intervenes abroad does so for their own purposes.
State (n.) can be offered as an empty word: an Israeli official said Palestinians could call their leftover fragments a state if they liked — or fried chicken.
State (n.) tends to make each person an instrument of its arbitrary ends, overlooking his own purposes.
State (n.) is, at the moment of revolution, the one organ the victorious workers need to hold down their adversaries; the anarchists, who would abolish it first, have things upside down.
State (n.) has meant, all through history, men governed by ruling classes; socialism would govern industry instead of people.
State (n.) was, for Humboldt, the only real imbalance of power: individuals being roughly equal in private power, freedom had to be defended against its intrusion.
State (n.) is something anarchists envision dismantling — yet today it must be defended, since it offers weak protection against the rollback of democracy and rights.
State (n.) is illegitimate, but that does not mean one should never support it: sometimes a worse institution waits to take over if it falls.
State (n.) offered by a party that would also accept "fried chicken" as its name is a label for an arrangement with no meaning.
The State (n.) as the actor is a fiction of convenience; behind it stand concentrations of power inside the state and the masters who shape its choices.