Terrorism (n.) can be stopped when the u.S. Stops participating in it itself.
Terrorism (n.) is the wanton killing of innocent civilians. Thus, our war cannot be called a war against terrorism.
Terrorism (n.) is in the eye of the beholder. In much of the world the U.S. is regarded as a leading terrorist state.
Terrorism (n.) committed by us can nearly start a nuclear war and still not be thought worth reporting.
Terrorism (n.) in its ideological sense is only what other people do.
Terrorism (n.) feeds on violent responses to it: they help the vanguard win over the far larger crowd that rejects its methods but shares its grievances.
Terrorism (n.) is defined, in the official canon, less by the deed than by the doer: the same atrocity drops out of the record when the wrong agent commits it.
Terrorism (n.) needs no lessons for Iraqis, who lose every month, relative to population, as many as Americans lost on September 11 — and often blame the war on terror for it.
Terrorism (n.) rose and fell in the news with almost nothing happening in the world — rising when the public had to be mobilized behind state violence, subsiding when the bills came due.
Terrorism (n.) admits three honest stances — blame the official enemy, dismiss the topic, or study it and let the chips fall — and only the last is unthinkable, because it leads home.
Terrorism (n.) made an ideal enemy for the 1980s: weak enough to be attacked with impunity, menacing enough to rally the public behind state power at home and violence abroad.
Terrorism (n.) is terrorism only when official enemies commit it; when we or our clients do the same, it is the defense of democracy and human rights.
Terrorism (n.) gives governments an occasion to discipline their own populations.
Terrorism (n.) is "a war against ordinary citizens," Shultz said, while US planes bombed Libya — the first terror attack timed for prime-time news.
Terrorism (n.) is whatever our leaders declare it to be, by the convenient definition in force. Period.
Terrorism (n.) is the means left to weak states and the disaffected who see the US as the agent or symbol of their suffering, when no one addresses their grievances.
Terrorism (n.) is said to be impossible to define, though official definitions are clear enough; the trouble is that they describe our own counterterror too.
Terrorism (n.) can win the quiet sympathy of those who detest it: wealthy secular Arabs called bin Laden "the conscience of Islam" because at least he reacted to US policies.
Terrorism (n.) that serves us is protected by silence: the Times ran an editorial called 'Murderous Poland' but never one called 'Murderous El Salvador'.
Terrorism (n.) has no more loyal agents than the media that picture themselves as its sworn enemies, so long as the terror is sponsored by their own government.