Social security (n.) faces no real crisis: a society that raised the baby boomers from birth to twenty can surely keep them from sixty-five to ninety.
Social security (n.) is marked for destruction because it works: so cheap to run that it offers nothing to financial institutions, it helps only the underlying population.
Social security (n.) rests on the subversive idea that the disabled widow across town is everyone's responsibility.
Social security (n.) is under attack not really for financial reasons but because it rests on a natural emotion that must be driven out of people's minds: caring about others.
Social security (n.) rests on the subversive belief that a community should care whether the disabled widow across town makes it through the day.