Mathematics (n.) is nothing but a machine, a high-level abacus. As such, it does not describe anything. It has no meaning, and can say no more about existence than any machine.
Mathematics (n.) is the denomination in which the most sin has been committed through the misuse of metaphor.
Mathematics (n.) is where process and result are equivalent.
Mathematics (n.) is always laying fresh roads for traffic, extending the old network.
Mathematics (n.) seems to introduce us to the mysteries of a mathematical world — the very aspect to be warned against.
Mathematics (n.) creates new expressions, not new propositions: instruments taken into the language once and for all.
Mathematics (n.) is a motley of techniques of proof, and its manifold usefulness rests on that.
Mathematics (n.) reduced to logic is like tables, chairs and cupboards wrapped in enough paper to look spherical in the end.
Mathematics (n.) as such is always the measure, never the thing measured.
Mathematics (n.) needs its signs to be used in mufti, outside mathematics; that outside use is what makes the sign-game mathematics.
Mathematics (n.) cannot simply be a game, or dancing would be mathematics too.
Mathematics (n.) grows each time an irrational number is expanded further, however queer that sounds.
Mathematics (n.) might be called a family of activities with a family of purposes.
Mathematics (n.) alone gives its signs their meaning, so one cannot appeal beyond it to what they mean.
Mathematics (n.) is not a sharply bounded concept.
Mathematics (n.) is always looked at under the aspect of finding — why not of doing?
Mathematics (n.) stands on a pedestal because of the role its propositions play in our language-games.
Mathematics (n.) teaches not just answers but a whole language-game of questions and answers; it took arithmetic to teach you to ask how many vibrations a note has.
Mathematics (n.) may not teach us facts but create the forms of what we call facts.
Mathematics (n.) turns experiments into definitions.