The Desire of the analyst (n.) is not a pure desire but a desire to obtain absolute difference.
Desire of the analyst (n.) is the one point where the problem of desire cannot be eluded.
The Desire of the analyst (n.) is the point the training analysis exists to reach — the question modern science never asks of its own physicists.
The Desire of the analyst (n.) must stand in the forefront of an ethics yet to be formulated — one that integrates Freud's conquests in the realm of desire.
The Desire of the analyst (n.) is the pivot around which the patient's trust turns — the thing the analyst himself must know is at stake, since he is no god.
The Desire of the analyst (n.) brings back the drive that transference separates from demand — in an upside-down hypnosis where the analyst plays the hypnotized one.
The Desire of the analyst (n.) is the axis, the handle, the hammer by which force is applied to what first appears in the patient's speech as demand — the transference.