Intersubjectivity (n.) offers no true conception: one only moves from one corrective to another, from one mirage to the next.
Intersubjectivity (n.) is a mirage when we look at our neighbour and think he's thinking what we're thinking — a gross error, and the necessary starting point.
Intersubjectivity (n.) must be there at the beginning, since it is there at the end: no bridge leads from animal desire to the recognition of desire.
Intersubjectivity (n.) shows itself in the child not in tender regard but in the cold sentence 'When you are dead, Mummy, I'll have your hats' — the proof is that he can use language.
Intersubjectivity (n.) imagined as a symmetrical I and thou of brothers — Buber plus personalism — makes the confusion definitive and irremediable.
Intersubjectivity (n.) is structured by what is not there: what matters is not that the enemy sees where I am but that he sees where I am going — where I am not.
Intersubjectivity (n.) is not the ultimate horizon: before the dialogue partner there is the Other as Thing, the neighbour as sleazy repulsive presence giving body to an unbearable excess of jouissance — which Habermas represses.
Intersubjectivity (n.) as the inmixing of subjects is the structured crowd that enters at the end of a dream — the subject mixing into things, and the unconscious taking place between subjects rather than inside one.
Intersubjectivity (n.) played on the dual level of ego and alter ego never reaches a second order: the moment you think of the third move, an oscillation sends you back to the first.