An Object (n.) in the Sadean fantasy is no more than the power to support a form of suffering.
Object (n.) of human interest is the object of the other's desire — which is why the human world is covered with objects.
Object (n.) in the human world multiplies in its luxuriance only through expulsion, linked to the instinct of primitive destruction.
An Object (n.) in object-relations theory is sustained by a straightforward confusion of the real, the imaginary and the symbolic.
An Object (n.) is always more or less structured as the image of the subject's body — your reflection is somewhere in every picture you perceive.
An Object (n.) is what interests a man because it is more or less his own image, his reflection — which is exactly why it is not the Thing.
An Object (n.) presents itself broken and decomposed — not as a pathology but as an impasse constitutive of desire itself, as the collector shows.
An Object (n.) world is always built as an attempt to rediscover the object — and what appears exactly as expected isn't in the least interesting.
An Object (n.) is found by repeating the quest for it — except it never is the same object, so the subject never ceases generating substitutes.
An Object (n.) that matters to a human being is a speaking object, through whose discourse he sees revealed the processes that inhabit his own unconscious.
An Object (n.) is by nature a refound object — that it was ever lost is only a consequence, deduced after the fact from the finding.
An Object (n.) of the drive is, Freud says, of no importance, a matter of total indifference — when you read that, prick up your ears.
Object (n.) for humans is originally mediated through rivalry: the subject first grasps himself as ego in the rival, so the human object belongs from the start to alienation.
An Object (n.) gets its meaning and value only through another subject: I relate to an object because someone other than me relates to it, and we can both name it.
Object (n.) enters human desire by rivalry: isolated, neutralized, and so all the more erotized — which is why we desire so many more things than animals.
An Object (n.) of human quest is never a rediscovery in the sense of reminiscence: it always constitutes itself through a first loss — nothing fruitful takes place in man save through the loss of an object.