Continuity (n.) in the history of ideas — Linnaeus still valid, Keynes reading Cantillon — is only a surface appearance over wholesale ruptures.
Continuity (n.) in history is the shelter of the sovereign subject: the promise that time disperses nothing it will not one day hand back.
Continuity (n.) is no less problematic than rupture: the same and the repetitive are not reassuring inertia but are themselves actively, regularly formed.
Continuity (n.) in Classical natural history precedes time and is its condition: history plays only a negative role, picking one form to survive or letting it vanish.
Continuity (n.) of nature was the Classical answer to Hume's doubt: natural history cannot rest on the imagination's analogies, so there must be continuity in nature.
Continuity (n.) is devalued by its own champions: treating it as the primary law and gravitational field of discourse, the agoraphobics of history neutralize it, driving it out to an original passivity.