Critique (n.) is a patient labor giving form to our impatience for liberty.
Critique (n.) today means turning the necessary limit into a possible transgression.
Critique (n.) not only suspends judgment but offers a new practice of values based on that very suspension.
Critique (n.) can never take in our historical limits whole, which is why it is always beginning again.
Critique (n.) is the art of voluntary insubordination, of reflected intractability.
Critique (n.) of law, even the radical kind that calls law organized violence, still assumes that power ought by nature to be lawful.
Critique (n.) seems condemned to dispersion, dependency and pure heteronomy: it exists only in relation to something other than itself.
Critique (n.) is the movement by which the subject grants himself the right to question truth about its power effects and power about its truth discourses.
Critique (n.) must turn from Kant's necessary limitation into a practical critique of possible crossing-over — not what we must not exceed, but where we might cross.
Critique (n.) here is not saying everyone else is wrong but defining one's own blank space by the exteriority of what surrounds it.
Critique (n.) is the handbook of a reason that has come of age, just as the Enlightenment is the age of critique.
Critique (n.) aims to make people no longer know what to do, so that acts and words that went without saying become problematic, difficult, dangerous.
Critique (n.) is not about pointing to any lack of knowledge... it is about referring to the limits truth regimes impose on autonomy and equality.
Critique (n.) began as resistance to ecclesiastical rule: returning to the Scriptures to question what kind of truth they told.
Critique (n.) is the handbook of reason grown up in the Enlightenment — and the Enlightenment is the age of critique.
Critique (n.) serves a future or a truth it will never know or become; it oversees a field it would not want to police and cannot regulate.
Critique (n.) is not saying that something is bad. Rather, it consist in making visible the assumptions on which accepted practices are based.
Critique (n.) is the art of not being governed like that, by that, in the name of those principles, at that cost — not the art of being ungovernable.
Critique (n.) is not wanting to be governed: not accepting as true what an authority tells you because an authority tells you — accepting it only if you find the reasons valid.
Critique (n.) is not saying that things are not good as they are; it is seeing what assumptions, familiar notions and unexamined ways of thinking accepted practices rest on.