History (n.) is by definition symbolic.
History (n.) in Hegel's machine is only the progress of the schools and nothing more.
History (n.) is the subject's centre of gravity — the present synthesis of the past.
History (n.) in each life is unified by the law, by a symbolic universe that is not the same for everyone.
History (n.) contains events that can be judged only as symptoms — Marx's insight, given its meaning by the discourse of the hysteric.
History (n.) comes in handy: it has not one meaning but a thousand and one, and people like to lean on it.
History (n.) is not the past; it is the past as historicised in the present, because it was once lived.
History (n.) in analysis is a balance in which conjectures about the past are weighed against promises of the future on the knife-edge of chronological certainty.
History (n.) of the personal kind is written in the future anterior: not what I was, nor what I have been, but what I shall have been for what I am becoming.
History (n.) of the subject is not development (Entwicklung) but Geschichte — that within which the subject recognises himself, past and future at once.
History (n.) keeps only what has been given a meaning: Mlle de Montpensier may have been at the barricades by chance, but that is all that remains of her.
History (n.) has laws that are useless for predicting tomorrow — modestly postponing their certainties to the day after, and retouched to predict what happened yesterday; their real value is as ideals.
History (n.) is already making itself on the stage where it will be played: the same riot is a different event lived as Court against Parlement or as proletariat against bourgeoisie.
History (n.) is not the past. It is the past insofar as it is historicized in the present. It projects demands retroactively onto the past.