Dogmatism (n.) as method in philosophy merely masks mistakes, when philosophy's whole aim is to let every step of reason be seen in the clearest light.
Dogmatism (n.) teaches us nothing; skepticism promises us absolutely nothing — not even the tranquility of a permitted ignorance.
Dogmatism (n.) in metaphysics lets anyone play the master — but no one does so for long without someone repaying him in kind.
Dogmatism (n.) can only fight illusion with illusion, because it does not know the hidden dialectic that lies as much in its own breast as in its opponent's.
Dogmatism (n.) about the supersensible is the direct road to philosophical enthusiasm, and only a critique of reason itself can cure it.
Dogmatism (n.) is metaphysics as despotism — a rule whose legislation kept traces of ancient barbarism and so decayed, through civil wars, into anarchy.
Dogmatism (n.) is the stubbornness that sets its mind rigidly to certain assertions without a fair hearing for the opposite — one of the two deaths of healthy philosophy.
Dogmatism (n.) only increases our ignorance, however its answer comes out — removing one inconceivability to replace it with another, one obscurity to plunge us into a greater.
Dogmatism (n.) is not dogmatic procedure — science must always be dogmatic — but the presumption of getting on with pure concepts without first asking by what right reason has them.
Dogmatism (n.) as method can never give the satisfaction of knowing there are no more principles to find; the critical method derives them all from one principle.
Dogmatism (n.) of pure reason supplies the cornerstones of morality and religion — a beginning to the world, a simple and incorruptible self, freedom, an original being.