Teleology (n.) of the moral kind first founds a theology, making up for what physical teleology lacks.
Teleology (n.) is neither natural science nor theology but a branch of critique — of the power of judgement.
Teleology (n.) brought to its highest perfection proves not that God exists but only that we cannot conceive such a world without thinking of a cause acting by design.
Teleology (n.) is that nature does not make grass to feed cows, and cows to feed men, she makes grass in order that there should be grass, and so on.
Teleology (n.) meant to supplement the unity of nature ends by doing away with it once a highest ordering being is posited first — then order is foreign and contingent to the nature of things.
Teleology (n.) considers nature as a kingdom of ends to explain what is; ethics regards a possible kingdom of ends as a kingdom of nature, to bring about what is not yet.
Teleology (n.) left to itself tempts reason to extravagant conclusions; aesthetics left to itself risks sliding into mere empiricism and losing its claim to necessity.
Teleology (n.) in nature rests on a bit of mental jugglery: we read the conception of an end into things to make nature intelligible by analogy with ourselves, rather than finding it there.
Teleology (n.) of the moral kind needs no God to explain it, any more than the useful properties of geometrical figures need a designer — yet it turns us toward the world in which our ends must be realized.
Teleology (n.) that posits an intelligent cause of the world is a sound maxim for reflection that keeps the door open to mechanism — but made into a claim, it wanders into transcendent regions and goes astray.
Teleology (n.) is brought into nature by our own understanding, which then wonders at a miracle of its own creation — like marvelling that the digits of every multiple of 9 add to 9, when the decimal system set up the surprise.
Teleology (n.) under perverted reason begins with an anthropomorphic highest intelligence and imposes ends on nature dictatorially, instead of seeking them reasonably — a vicious circle that presupposes what ought to be proved.