An Intelligible world (n.) is one in which everything is actual simply because, being good, it is possible.
The Intelligible world (n.) arises from an excusable but unjustifiable mistake: making objects conform to concepts instead of concepts to possible intuitions.
The Intelligible world (n.) is given to us as actual only in a practical respect: what would be extravagant for theory is, for action, immanent.
The Intelligible world (n.) as a positive realm cannot be permitted at all: concepts may be divided into sensible and intellectual, but objects may not.
The Intelligible world (n.) is nothing but the concept of a world in general with all conditions of intuiting it stripped away — about which no synthetic proposition, yes or no, is possible.
The Intelligible world (n.) is a legitimate idea for rational belief though all knowledge stops at its threshold: it kindles interest in the moral law through the ideal of a universal kingdom of ends.
The Intelligible world (n.) is archetypal nature, the world of understanding we cognize only in reason; ectypal nature is its copy, which ought to exist in the world of sense.
The Intelligible world (n.) is nothing but the representation of a problem whose object is perfectly possible in itself but whose solution, given our understanding, is completely impossible.
The Intelligible world (n.) was granted sole reality by the earliest philosophers because they took appearance and illusion to be one and the same — excusable in an uncultivated age.
The Intelligible world (n.) signifies only the something that remains over when everything sensible is eliminated from the will's motives — it fences in sensibility and shows there is more beyond it, but this more I know no further.
The Intelligible world (n.) is the vacant place speculative reason kept open for the unconditioned — and which pure practical reason now fills with a determinate law, the moral law.
The Intelligible world (n.) is only a standpoint reason is compelled to take outside appearances in order to think itself practical; to borrow any motive from it would be to pretend to know what it knows nothing of.
The Intelligible world (n.) made out of astronomy explained by Copernicus or Newton, as against astronomy merely observed, is a perversion of words, a sophistical evasion that shrinks a troublesome question into a commonplace.
The Intelligible world (n.) is the tempting thought that, if the senses show things as they appear, the understanding must show them as they are — an entirely different field, a world thought in spirit, even more nobly occupying the understanding.