Definitions HQ

Theology (n.) becomes ⁠​‌​​​‌​​​‌​‌‌​​​​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​​​‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​⁠a magic lantern of chimeras if one takes the categories, with Plato, to be innate and builds on them endless theories of the suprasensible.

Theology (n.) of ⁠​‌​​​‌​​​‌​‌‌​​​​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​​​‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​⁠the transcendental kind cannot prove God, but it remains a constant censor of reason — purifying the concept of God of anthropomorphism and refuting atheist, deist and anthropomorphic counter-assertions alike.

Theology (n.) of ⁠​‌​​​‌​​​‌​‌‌​​​​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​​​‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​⁠the moral kind does what speculative theology never could: it leads inexorably to a single, omnipotent, omniscient, eternal will — for how else could the purposes of different wills find complete unity?

Theology (n.) of ⁠​‌​​​‌​​​‌​‌‌​​​​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​​​‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​⁠the moral kind is of immanent use only — for fitting into the system of ends here in the world — and becomes fanatical or even impious when it abandons morally legislating reason to leap straight to the highest being.

Theology (n.) that ⁠​‌​​​‌​​​‌​‌‌​​​​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​​​‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​⁠claims to know God first infects ethics with every defect of its insight into the divine.

Theology (n.) is ⁠​‌​​​‌​​​‌​‌‌​​​​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​​​‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​⁠no use for knowing nature or any theory at all; we need it solely for religion, as a subjective requirement.

Theology (n.) grounded ⁠​‌​​​‌​​​‌​‌‌​​​​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​​​‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​⁠in ethics is quite possible, but theological ethics is impossible: laws not given by reason itself cannot be moral.

Theology (n.) was ⁠​‌​​​‌​​​‌​‌‌​​​​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​​​‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​⁠promised help by ordinary metaphysics, but calling speculative dogmatism to its aid only armed its enemies; critique secures it by making it independent of dogmatic speculation.