Definitions HQ

Transcendental illusion (n.) would ⁠​‌​​​‌​​​‌​‌‌​​​​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​​​‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​⁠never be noticed as deceptive if it did not betray itself through a conflict reason has with itself.

The Transcendental illusion (n.) passes ⁠​‌​​​‌​​​‌​‌‌​​​​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​​​‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​⁠off the subjective necessity of connecting our concepts as an objective necessity — a determination of things in themselves.

The Transcendental illusion (n.) tempted ⁠​‌​​​‌​​​‌​‌‌​​​​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​​​‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​⁠metaphysics into the childish chase after soap bubbles, by taking appearances, mere representations, for things in themselves.

Transcendental illusion (n.) must ⁠​‌​​​‌​​​‌​‌‌​​​​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​​​‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​⁠not only be described but traced to its sources and explained as a phenomenon of the understanding, for the ideal is grounded on a natural, not an arbitrary, idea.

The Transcendental illusion (n.) breeds ⁠​‌​​​‌​​​‌​‌‌​​​​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​​​‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​⁠sophistries not of human beings but of pure reason itself — even the wisest may free himself from error, but never from the illusion that ceaselessly teases and mocks him.

The Transcendental illusion (n.) does ⁠​‌​​​‌​​​‌​‌‌​​​​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​​​‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​⁠not cease even when it is exposed and seen to be null — like the sea that looks higher in the middle than at the shore, or the rising moon that looks larger even to the astronomer who knows better.

The Transcendental illusion (n.) leads ⁠​‌​​​‌​​​‌​‌‌​​​​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​​​‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​⁠us by dialectical inferences from something we know to something of which we have no concept, and by an unavoidable illusion we nevertheless give it objective reality.

The Transcendental illusion (n.) works ⁠​‌​​​‌​​​‌​‌‌​​​​‌​‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​​​​‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​⁠by transcendental subreption, the unavoidable slide by which a merely formal, regulative principle is represented as constitutive and thought of hypostatically — as space, a mere form of sensibility, gets taken for a Something subsisting in itself.