Defence (n.) is the mental counterpart of the flight reflex, an automatic regulation against inner unpleasure that eventually has to come under conscious thought.
Defence (n.) is never completely successful, whatever the ego does and against whatever enemy.
Defence (n.) is the general notion; repression is only one of the mechanisms it uses, beside regression and reaction-formation.
Defence (n.) is an attempt at flight from an instinctual danger, though it does more than flee: it joins issue with the impulse and suppresses or deflects it.
Defence (n.) should be revived as the general term for all the ego's techniques in conflicts that may lead to neurosis, with repression kept for one special method.
Defence (n.) drives an unbearable idea out of consciousness and memory, but cannot erase the trace it leaves.
Defence (n.) works by weakening: it turns a strong idea into a weak one by robbing it of its feeling.
Defence (n.) may lie at the root of every hysteria, Freud suspected, even the kinds Breuer traced to dreamy states.
Defence (n.) edits the mind like a censor edits a manuscript: repression strikes passages out, the other defences distort the text so that no gap shows.
Defence (n.) against inner danger cannot be flight, since one cannot flee from oneself; it must falsify one's own perception instead.
A Defence (n.) kept after its usefulness becomes an infantilism, like an institution that keeps itself alive after its purpose has passed.
Defence (n.) links hysteria, obsession and some confusional psychoses: each begins with trying to repress an idea at odds with the ego.