Normality (n.) is nothing other than the ability to love and to work.
Normality (n.) is being more fortunate than Oedipus: having detached our desire from our mothers and forgotten our jealousy of our fathers.
Normality (n.) differs from neurosis only in quantity, not in kind — and the healthy dream in plainer symbols than the sick, whose censor is stronger.
Normality (n.) is measured by how much of ourselves we keep suppressed; even perfect health never fully subdues the unconscious.
Normality (n.) holds a paradox: the normal man is far more immoral than he believes and far more moral than he knows.
Normality (n.) depends on keeping certain inner resistances in place; when they relax, as in sleep or psychosis, the unconscious breaks through.
Normality (n.) has no scientific border with the abnormal; the line is purely conventional, which is why disorders can teach us about health.
Normality (n.) is an ideal fiction; everyone is normal only on the average.
Normality (n.) and neurosis differ as chemical substances do: great differences of quality from variations in the proportions of the same elements.
Normality (n.) is the condition in which consciousness controls feeling and action; its hold on action breaks only in psychosis, its hold on feeling is less secure even in normal life.
Normality (n.) that the educator insists on has a price, paid in lost efficiency and lost capacity for enjoyment.
Normality (n.) differs from neurosis and psychosis only in degree; the normal manage the same repressions more successfully.
Normality (n.) would be, in the absolute, no type at all: a perfect harmony of all three uses of love, which no one has.