The Intellect (n.) is a soft voice, which does not rest until it has gained a hearing, which is one of the few points in which one may be optimistic about the future of mankind.
The Intellect (n.) has a soft voice which does not rest till it has gained a hearing.
Intellect (n.) speaks in a soft voice, but it does not rest till it has gained a hearing — and after countless rebuffs, it succeeds.
The Intellect (n.) will have its primacy in a distant, distant future, but probably not an infinitely distant one, and it will seek what believers expect from God: the love of man and the decrease of suffering.
Intellect (n.) demands unity, connection and intelligibility from everything it grasps — and when it cannot find a true connection, it does not hesitate to fabricate a false one.
Intellect (n.) can do its hardest work without consciousness — the problem you wrestled with in vain is solved by the time you wake.
Intellect (n.) functions reliably only when removed from strong emotion; otherwise it is an instrument of the will that delivers the inference the will requires.
Intellect (n.) is a weak, dependent thing, the toy and tool of our instincts and feelings — we act cleverly or stupidly as our inner resistances dictate.
Intellect (n.) in man has no good scent for truth: it errs easily without suspecting it, and nothing is more readily believed than what meets our wishes and illusions half-way.