Perversion (n.) stages as reality what the hysteric fantasizes and the paranoic complains of — the same sexual and cruel maltreatment, down to detail.
Perversion (n.) is what a sexual trend looks like where no ideal was formed to censor it.
Perversion (n.) is not degeneracy: such departures from the sexual aim are found in every period and every people, the most primitive and the most civilized.
Perversion (n.) is nothing but infantile sexuality magnified and split into its separate impulses.
Perversion (n.) lies not in any particular variation but in its exclusiveness: the same act as a prelude to intercourse is no perversion at all.
Perversion (n.) is love stuck in an earlier phase, still pursuing an aim that has nothing to do with the normal sexual one.
Perversion (n.) are neither bestial nor degenerate but developments of germs in every child's disposition, which suppressed or sublimated feed many cultural achievements.
Perversion (n.) should be spoken of without indignation: the bounds of the normal vary by race and era, and everyone strays slightly beyond them.
A Perversion (n.) begins as one sexual component racing ahead of the rest, fixed there and left behind by later development.