A Contract (n.) and other legal forms merely express economic content; they make it look like the free will of the parties, but cannot themselves determine it.
A Contract (n.) is, to the jurist, a relationship individuals may enter or not as they please, its content resting purely on their individual will, as if their meeting at all were fortuitous.
A Contract (n.) is holding property not merely through a thing and my will, but through another person's will — participation in a common will, where freedom truly exists.
A Contract (n.) shows the legal mind at most a material difference between buying labour and buying any other commodity, expressed in the formulae do ut des, do ut facias, facio ut des and facio ut facias.
A Contract (n.) in the constant renewal of sale and purchase only perpetuates the specific relationship of dependency, while endowing it with the deceptive illusion of a transaction between equally free and equally matched commodity owners.