Manufacture (n.) whatever its starting-point always ends as a productive mechanism whose organs are human beings.
Manufacture (n.) in classical antiquity already counted as a corruption, a business for freedmen, clients and foreigners.
Manufacture (n.) became the peasants' refuge from the guilds, just as the guild-towns had once been their refuge from the nobility.
Manufacture (n.) first took root not in the guild towns but in villages without guilds, seizing on spinning and weaving, the crafts that needed the least training.
Manufacture (n.) is easily introduced into a country and, for that very reason, easily destroyed — so no country dared expose it to free competition.
Manufacture (n.) accomplishes the social organization of labour only by riveting each worker to a single fraction of the work.
Manufacture (n.) consisted first in bringing many workers into one room under the command of one capital, not in analysing labour; the division of labour came after the gathering.
Manufacture (n.) was not born of friendly agreements between equals, nor in the guilds: it was the merchant, not the guildmaster, who became head of the modern workshop.
Manufacture (n.) towered up as an artificial economic construction on the broad base of town handicrafts and rural domestic industry — until its narrow technical basis collided with the needs it had itself created.
Manufacture (n.) seizes labour-power by its roots: it forces one skill as in a hothouse by suppressing a whole world of drives — as on the River Plate they butcher a whole beast for its hide or its tallow.