A Contradiction (n.) is hard only in its general formulation: no sooner are contradictions specified than they are explained.
A Contradiction (n.) inside capital seeks resolution by extending the external field of production.
A Contradiction (n.) between a theory and the world can only occur because social relations have already fallen out with the forces of production.
A Contradiction (n.) in Proudhon exists only between his fixed idea and the real movement.
A Contradiction (n.) is hard only while stated in general terms; once you specify it, it is already half explained.
Contradiction (n.) in capital is not something to deny but something to develop in full; Ricardo instead shifts it off by treating exchange value as a mere formality.
Contradiction (n.) in production resting on capital is constantly overcome and constantly recreated, and overcome only by force — though up to a point this looks like a quiet levelling out.
A Contradiction (n.) begins wherever things that need each other inwardly exist outwardly as strangers who may or may not meet.
A Contradiction (n.) is not abolished by development but given a form within which it has room to move — as the ellipse lets a body fall constantly toward another while constantly flying away from it.
A Contradiction (n.) for the bourgeois economist is a mere semblance, present in everyday reality but not existing in itself, and therefore having no theoretical existence either.
A Contradiction (n.) developed inside a historical form of production is the only historical way that form can be dissolved and then reconstructed on a new basis.
A Contradiction (n.) of the absurd and flat kind is home ground for John Stuart Mill, who is at sea with the Hegelian contradiction, the source of all dialectics.