Science (n.) and Christianity can quarrel only because they speak the same language and deal with the same universe — the universe of facts.
Science (n.) was Dr. Kunihiko Hashida's Zen practice; he said his lifework was "to science" rather than "to study science."
Science (n.) in its modern language describes nothing but changing patterns of relationship — whether chemical, nuclear or human — and never asks what stuff they are made of.
Science (n.) in its rigorous, sterile spirit has often been a form of hostility — scrubbing the universe clean of mystery until it is quite dead.
Science (n.) could rest on an erotic sense of reality instead of an aggressive, dominating attitude toward it.
Science (n.) and the Hebrew–Christian tradition share a notion of truth as the structure of an objective reality, determinate even where unseen.
Science (n.) and philosophy can reveal only the universe's mechanism, never its meaning — its Tao.
Science (n.) has paid for its miracles in this world with the disappearance of the world to come.
Science (n.) describes a symbol of the real universe, as handy as money for practical arrangements — and as heavy a burden once confused with the real thing.
Science (n.) did not prove religion false in their long clash; it showed that every system of definition serves some purpose and none grasps reality.
Science (n.) speaks of the past and the future: it describes how things happened and bets on what will, without needing God or eternal life.
Science (n.) is splendid not for naming and predicting but for wanting the facts, whatever they turn out to be — an openness that resembles true religion.
Science (n.) in China owed more to the Taoists than the Confucians: one school watched animals, wind and water, the other kept its nose in books of rules.