Science (n.) is not a perfect instrument, but it is a superb and invaluable tool that works harm only when taken as an end in itself.
Science (n.) is the art of creating suitable illusions which the fool believes or argues against, but the wise man enjoys for their beauty or their ingenuity, without being blind to the fact that they are human veils and curtains concealing the abysmal darkness of the unknowable.
Science (n.) is the tool of the western mind and with it more doors can be opened than with bare hands.
Science (n.) trades the certainty of faith for the uncertainty of human knowledge — and leaves the conscious mind stranded in a world of psychic forces.
Science (n.) became the prisoner of the world it had conquered, as the victor usually does — the world was not only deprived of its gods but lost its soul.
Science (n.) does not aim to describe facts exactly — camera and gramophone record better — but to find laws, shorthand for many different processes.
Science (n.) is not the summa of life but only one of the psychological attitudes, one of the forms of human thought.
Science (n.) is a language of metaphor too — it only shifts the old symbols back a little, creating merely a new symbol for the same enigma, though in practice it works better than mythology's concretisms.
Science (n.) healed the rift between man and nature but cost him his special metaphysical rank — hence the quarrel of faith and knowledge.
Science (n.) is ethically superior to the old worldviews because man sacrifices himself to it: the old believer saw his own face as the face of the world, in the likeness of God — a glory not too dearly bought even with everlasting damnation.
Science (n.) are symptoms of man's psyche — he produced them out of himself and his peculiar constitution.
Science (n.) is descriptive wherever it can no longer experiment, without ceasing to be science; it makes itself impossible only when it fences its field by theory.
Science (n.) may lament that it cannot prove faith valid or invalid, but it cannot jump over its own shadow.
Science (n.) repeats the Gnostic myth of the Nous, who saw his reflection in the depths of matter, plunged down, and was swallowed in Physis's embrace.
Science (n.) presents its results as if they had come into being without man's intervention, conveying a world from which the real human psyche is excluded — the very antithesis of the humanities.
Science (n.) is the form in which the liberal age worships God — so Galileo today would sun himself on a Los Angeles beach beside Einstein, a made man.
Science (n.) as a label sets the modern mind at rest almost as well as “Rome has spoken, the matter is settled.”
Science (n.) began, curiously, with the withdrawal of the most distant projections — the stars — the first stage in despiritualizing the world.
Science (n.) always ends in the unknowable, but it would cease to be science if it took its present limits for final ones.
Science (n.) that ignores man's feeling for values merely puts shallow sophistry in place of nature's healing processes.