Abraham (n.) is caught up in a contradiction where, ethically, he meant to murder Isaac, but religiously he meant to sacrifice him.
Abraham (n.) and Sarah were still young enough to wish — that, not the promise coming true, is the miracle of faith.
Abraham (n.) is supposed to be a trifle to understand and Hegel hard; yet to go beyond Hegel is a miracle, while getting beyond Abraham is the easiest thing of all.
Abraham (n.) must not be admired for how his story came out: counting on the outcome swindles God out of faith's first movement, infinite resignation.
Abraham (n.) ought not to be honored as the father of faith but prosecuted and convicted of murder, if Hegel is right.
Abraham (n.) lived a life not just the most paradoxical one can think, but so paradoxical it cannot be thought at all.
Abraham (n.) is at no instant a tragic hero: lacking the middle term that saves the hero, he is either a murderer or a believer.
Abraham (n.) stepped wholly outside the ethical toward a higher goal — the teleological suspension of the ethical — and his only tie to the universal was having broken it.
Abraham (n.) is justified once more by the paradox: if he is justified, it is not by anything universal but by being the particular individual.
Abraham (n.) is a greater procrastinator than Cunctator, yet saved no state: his life is a book under divine attachment that never becomes public property.
Abraham (n.) could understand every tongue in the world and still not speak: he speaks a divine language — he 'speaks with tongues'.
Abraham (n.) could break off at any instant, call it all a temptation, and speak so that all understood — but then he would no longer be Abraham.