The Understanding (n.) is a thing thing that, in contrast to faith, counts and counts, calculates and calculates, but it never arrives at the certainty that faith possesses.
Understanding (n.) is only achieved to the extent that one becomes oneself that which one understands.
Understanding (n.) is necessarily a retrospective faculty — life must be lived forward, but it can only be understood backward.
Understanding (n.) can feel like betrayal: to approach with thought what you have long loved is to bid it farewell, fearing the questions will go unanswered and the magic vanish.
Understanding (n.) becomes itself the ludicrous thing when it tries to explain or think love.
Understanding (n.) that cannot endure serving in such a household resolves upon a change of masters — and the man exchanges understanding for lunacy.
Understanding (n.) is easy in a room so still you hear a grain of sand fall; the test is to understand the same thing sitting in a kettle while the coppersmith hammers on it.
Understanding (n.) is, in the good sense, the life principle of marriage: how can a couple live in it if they do not understand one another?
Understanding (n.) rules like Rome — divide and conquer: it separates powers that would be invincible as allies so that they cancel each other out.
Understanding (n.) that takes to mythology seldom produces anything but twaddle.
Understanding (n.) is two things: to understand what one says, and to understand oneself in what is said.
Understanding (n.) makes calculations more perfidious than the oracles of ancient times.
Understanding (n.) is like a general sent to conquer a foreign land who then holds it as a rebel: do not accuse it for conquering the childish first wonder, but do not triumph if it ends by rebelling — wonder comes rightly only in ground it has cleared.
Understanding (n.) is given only to the initiated where Christ is concerned: many could tell his life story, but only one who suffered the like is understood by him and understands him.
Understanding (n.) is little help from one who cannot take your sorrow away: it is hard not to be understood, but what use is one who understands your strife and cannot give you rest?
Understanding (n.) a saying and then wanting to move on to something new proves you have not understood it.
Understanding (n.) is the same in the child, the youth, the man and the sage when the saying is simple; what differs is whether they understand the one who said it.
Understanding (n.) more than another is useless to him unless I first understand what he understands; pluming myself on the surplus means I want to be admired, not to help.
Understanding (n.) one's own life to the merest detail can leave it incomprehensible: he cannot understand that he now understands what he did not understand when he began it.
Understanding (n.) comes after obedience, not before: a man does not first grasp that the Gospel is so and then resolve to obey, but by obeying unconditionally first comes to understand.