Duty (n.) is what for the rebellious are fetters and for slavish minds hard duties — for the happily married, titles and dignities he would not exchange for a king's.
Duty (n.) enters love in the priest's “Thou shalt love her,” that dithyrambic, almost presumptuous wedding formula which is not content with love but calls it a duty; a couple who find it neither nonsensical nor capital lack an ear for the music of marriage.
Duty (n.) bows the lover down under its imperative, and resolution makes him stand erect again in its optative.
Duty (n.) conceived ideally by one who has entered into none keeps the primitiveness of childhood, the enthusiasm of youth and the anxiousness of melancholy — perhaps his best possession, and a constraint to the most reckless exertion.
Duty (n.) is the apparent contradiction at the heart of Christian love: that to love should be a duty is its very criterion.
Duty (n.) is what makes love secure: only when it is a duty to love is love everlastingly secure against change, emancipated, and assured against despair.
Duty (n.) is the only emancipating power: it makes a man dependent and at the same time eternally independent.
Duty (n.) as shopkeeping souls do it clips the coin a trifle — they think that however carefully the Lord keeps His books, they may still cheat Him a little.
Duty (n.) is to the aesthete the rod that comes out the moment the married pair close the door — deck it out as you like, it remains a rod.
Duty (n.) comes to true lovers not as an intruder but as an old friend, whose command is only a more majestic way of saying that their wish can be realized: not 'it can be preserved' but 'it shall.'
Duty (n.) speaks not in the future tense of hope but in the imperative — 'Fear not, you shall conquer' — and in that lies an assurance nothing can shake.
Duty (n.) treated as love's enemy leaves love the loser: if love cannot vanquish it, love is not the true conqueror — so the aesthete disparages love as much as duty.
Duty (n.) and love are each other's temperate climate; perfection is their unity.
Duty (n.) is one thing only: to love truly from the heart — and it changes shape as freely as love, blessing all that is of love and condemning all that is not.
Duty (n.) commands, and more than that it cannot do; the 'more' I can do is to do what it commands — translate duty from outside to inside and you are beyond it.
Duty (n.) loves only true love and has a mortal hatred of false love, which it slays.
Duty (n.) is the divine authorization that says not 'You may' but 'Thou shalt' — expressed in the future tense to suggest its history.
Duty (n.) is not an imposition but what is incumbent upon one's true nature; whoever has clad himself in it does not chase breathlessly after his duties.
Duty (n.) needs less talk the more profoundly a life is planned ethically: no need to talk every instant about duty or consult others about what it is.
Duty (n.) is never done in general: no one 'does duty' — he does his duty; I can do duty and not do my duty, and do my duty and not do duty.