Commitment (n.) presupposes saying, so saying cannot rest on commitment.
Commitment (n.) does not describe signification; it is signification, the-one-for-the-other, that justifies all commitment.
Commitment (n.) encodes the language that tries to be direct, for commitment unknowingly agglomerates men into parties and their speech turns into politics.
Commitment (n.) stressed as engagement is really a way of guaranteeing disengagement in the midst of engagement, a nihilism given its noblest expression.
Commitment (n.) for the Jew cannot be made without also disengaging, even from a just cause, and he can never march off to war with banners unfurled and the Church's blessing.
Commitment (n.) at any price, burning its bridges, is no less inhuman than the comfortable disengagement that turns Judaism into an accessory of bourgeois comfort.
Commitment (n.) when it is blind thinks itself virtuous because of its decisiveness or stubbornness, the very thing a book that demands endless reading is foreign to.
Commitment (n.) already presupposes theoretical consciousness; without that assumption it would be mere capture, like a finger caught in a gear.