Ritual (n.) stands to the piety of obedience as the smile stands to kindness, the handshake to friendship, the caress to affection.
Ritual (n.) and truth, despite their power to awaken, may also have soporific virtues for an uncultured intelligence.
Ritual (n.) is not conduct meant to preserve a few ideas of rational theology but the ultimate intimacy with a God who revealed himself in history.
Ritual (n.) comes between myself and natural instincts; daily rite rooted in truth shakes up the somniferous course of natural life.
Ritual (n.) draws the line beyond which a man becomes a renegade: for a forbidden gesture, an altered formula, a profaned custom, people accept martyrdom.
Ritual (n.) both maintains and breaks the heart's naive impulse toward the good: passion mistrusts its own pathos and becomes consciousness again.
Ritual (n.) contains nothing numinous: in it a distance is taken up within nature in respect of nature — a deference that creates the very concept of a beyond.
Ritual (n.) has no intrinsic power — contact with the dead does not make one impure, nor does lustral water purify — and yet without it the soul cannot be raised to God.
Ritual (n.) whatever sociologists and ethnographers explain of it holds for whoever practises it an incommunicable truth, no less true than those sociological truths.
Ritual (n.) is the limit imposed on the interiorization of principles: once one sets out to 'spiritualize', no frontier in the depths of interiority can arrest the mental reserves, which retreat into the abyss of nihilism.