Totality (n.) is a purely theoretical idea; infinity is a moral one.
Totality (n.) fails not because the I is insufficient but because of the infinity of the Other.
Totality (n.) swallows the person as Cronos swallowed his son: thinking he swallows a god, he swallows but a stone.
Totality (n.) gives no meaning to death, which each person dies alone; death will not be absorbed into the Whole.
Totality (n.) makes sense only where some being can embrace it — there is a whole because it relates to an inwardness lit from within.
Totality (n.) sacrifices every present moment to a future that will finally tell it what it meant; only the last act counts.
Totality (n.) in Cartesian ontology is the Same integrating every Other — the equality of the unequal, the identity of identity and difference.
Totality (n.) is the face being shows in war: individuals reduced to bearers of forces that command them without their knowing.
Totality (n.) cannot encompass the bond between separated beings, an 'unrelating relation': whoever tried to totalize it would split being anew, since he would still be telling the total to someone.
Totality (n.) can be claimed by a particular being only if it is thoughtless — not thinking badly, but not thinking at all; such confusion is not thought but life.
Totality (n.) has burst apart: all cannot be assembled — a doubt cast on philosophy's most spontaneous gesture, encompassing the thinkable in the unity of a genus.
Totality (n.) in the movement that liberated man enslaves him within the system he builds, and in the State the individual experiences philosophical totality as totalitarian tyranny.