Speech (n.) in its essence is commanding.
Speech (n.) addresses an equal even when one speaks to a slave.
Speech (n.) belongs to the order of morality before belonging to that of theory.
Speech (n.) by being coherent has lost its speech, and words have become the mute signs of anonymous infrastructures.
Speech (n.) is an ever renewed promise to clarify what was obscure in the utterance — an inexhaustible surplus of attention.
Speech (n.) pretends to absoluteness: it can thematize everything, even its own failures, even its own relativity.
Speech (n.) that is immediate is ruse: it flatters and threatens a freedom to make it the accomplice of its own abdication.
Speech (n.) is action without action: it costs labor, yet exceeds it at every instant by the generosity of offering that very labor.
Speech (n.) disenchants: it introduces a principle into the anarchy of a world where every appearance may be a disguise.
Speech (n.) is the origin of all signification, of tools and human works; every symbolism already refers to language.
Speech (n.) as the fact that we speak is the very emphasis of being — being asserting itself so firmly that it resounds as a proposition.
Speech (n.) reverses the slide of the spoken word toward the written: the speaker comes to the assistance of his words and so has mastery, which writing has lost.
Speech (n.) is not instituted in an abstract medium but in a world where one must aid and give: it presupposes an I who does not welcome the face empty-handed.
Speech (n.) dies not because we do not know the one we talk to but because we no longer take his words seriously: we look behind them for the clockwork and tiny springs of his soul.