Love (n.) that does not act has no existence.
Love (n.) strives to make even the mortal element immortal.
Love (n.) at its truest means losing self-awareness by forgetting oneself inside another self.
Love (n.) is the only remedy for the great superiorities of others.
Love (n.) exists only between living beings equal in power, each in no respect dead for the other.
Love (n.) is liberation as feeling: having one's very own being in an other actuality.
Love (n.) moves us not so much by its sacrifice as by the undeserved bliss of remaining oneself in spite of all self-surrender.
Love (n.) destroys objectivity: in it the separate remains, but as united — life senses life.
Love (n.) is stronger than fear; it has no fear of its fear, but lets fear lead it to cancel separation.
Love (n.) is the feeling in which self-seeking and separate existence are negated — so the individual form perishes in it and cannot preserve itself.
Love (n.) is the ethical in the form of the natural — it has no place in the state, where unity must be known as law.
Love (n.) must be intelligent, for unintelligent love will perhaps do a man more harm than hatred.
Love (n.) that is deeply felt, the deeper it suffers, still finds in suffering the certainty of love and shows in grief that it has overcome itself.
Love (n.) expressed only by saying 'I love you' over and over would delight the theorists of the 'poetry of poetry' — and be the flattest prose.
Love (n.) shares one substance with friendship, bravery, honour and fame — and with family, fatherland and state: knowing oneself in another free self.
Love (n.) is a self-limitation in which one does not feel limited, but in contemplating the other as other has the feeling of oneself.
Love (n.) where the world is dead to us can only be a relation between a living subject and dead objects — and so it is girt by matter alone.
Love (n.) is the only peace I have with myself; without it I would be a contradiction that falls to pieces.
Love (n.) for Hegel lacked the strength, the patience and the application of the negative — so he kept it out of the foreground of his analysis.
Love (n.) is neither understanding nor reason; it neither restricts nor is restricted — a feeling, but not one feeling among others.