Guilt (n.) is not about feeling guilty, but about being open to the call of conscience,
Guilt (n.) means at bottom being the basis of a nullity — which is why Dasein as such is guilty.
Guilt (n.) shows itself most in being asleep: primordial guilt is older than any knowledge of it.
Guilt (n.) in its deepest sense is there before any debt is incurred and still there after every debt is paid off.
Guilt (n.) as part of existence proves nothing for or against sin; philosophy, strictly, 'knows' nothing about sin at all.
Guilt (n.) as nullity is not a shortfall from some ideal you failed to reach; you are null in advance of anything you could project or achieve.
Guilt (n.) need not be earned by failures or omissions; Dasein only has to be authentically the guilty one it already is.
Guilt (n.) does not result from indebtedness; indebtedness becomes possible only on the basis of a primordial being-guilty.
Guilt (n.) may belong to our very being, so that so far as any Dasein factically exists, it is also guilty — the 'Guilty!' turns up as a predicate of the 'I am'.
Guilt (n.) is an existential structure not to be understood as some psychological feeling that one gets when one transgresses some moral code.
Guilt (n.) toward another, formally, is being the basis of a lack in someone else's existence — being responsible for his being endangered, led astray or ruined, possibly without breaking any public law.
Guilt (n.) in the existential sense can be neither increased nor diminished; it comes before any quantification, and Dasein is never guilty merely on some occasions.
Guilt (n.) is phenomenological, meaning it is not the result of the transgression of this or that code, but the a priori condition for there to be moral codes.
Guilt (n.) in its moral sense has been so little thought through that it got mixed up with deserving punishment and owing debts — thrusting 'Guilty!' into the bookkeeping of reckoning up claims and balancing them off.
Guilt (n.) is an original ontological determination of the existence of Dasein — the pre-Christian ground that the theological concept of sin must answer to, though sin can never be deduced from it.
Guilt (n.) begins in everyday common sense as owing — having something due on account — and as being responsible for; but one can owe without being responsible, and be responsible without owing.