Negation (n.) cannot abolish an age; it only throws the negator off the path.
Negation (n.) does not produce the nothing; the nothing is older than the "not," and negation lives off it.
Negation (n.) and with it nullity, the essence of the not, can be interpreted only by way of the nature of time.
The Negation (n.) has been put to use again and again by ontology and logic, yet it has never itself been unveiled ontologically.
Negation (n.) is intimate to be-ing: the strife springs not from an opposition between two things but from the not that dwells inside be-ing itself.
Negation (n.) still points out: even 'the board is not red' shows the board as what it is — denial is a pointing-away, not a falling silent.
Negation (n.) is the thinnest of our ways of saying no: stinging rebuke, galling failure, merciless prohibition and bitter privation come from a far more abysmal source.
Negation (n.) is seen by almost everyone as rejection, degrading, destroying; its originary form is a not-granting that refuses to go along precisely because it recognizes the uniqueness of what it leaves.