Good and evil (n.) is but intervening shadows and damp afflictions and passing clouds.
Good and evil (n.) is spoken of by every culture in its own tongue which the neighbor does not understand.
Good and evil (n.) is that from which every high degree of power claims a freedom.
Good and evil (n.) is the most harmful harm.
Good and evil (n.) is the transmutation of something evil. In short, every God has a devil for a father.
Good and evil (n.) were first names for useful and harmful consequences; then we forgot, and believed the quality lay in the deed itself — as language calls the stone itself hard.
Good and evil (n.) differ only in degree: good actions are sublimated evil ones; evil actions are coarsened, brutalized good ones.
Good and evil (n.) began as petty conclusions: what harms me is evil in itself, what helps me is good in itself — behind which hides the most immodest thought: that we ourselves are the principle of the good.
Good and evil (n.) are the prejudices of God — said the snake.
Good and evil (n.) that would be everlasting do not exist: they must overcome themselves out of themselves again and again.
Good and evil (n.) are only shadows in between, damp glooms and drift-clouds; all things are baptized at the well of eternity beyond them.
Good and evil (n.) are the dowry of grave words given us almost from the cradle — for their sake we are forgiven for being alive.
Good and evil (n.) are known to no one yet — except the creator, who first gives the earth a goal and so makes it possible for anything to be good or evil.
Good and evil (n.) are only a world of appearance and perspective — an innovation so great that at the thought of it I sometimes lose hearing and sight.