Goodness (n.) was mostly developed by long dissimulation that sought to appear good: the lie is, if not the mother, then the nurse of goodness.
Goodness (n.) begins where the eye is too dull to see the evil impulse — hence the duller the eye, the more extensive the good.
Goodness (n.) of the highest kind has the highest evil belonging to it: the creative one must first be an annihilator and break values.
Goodness (n.) is expected only from those capable of all evil; the weaklings think themselves good because their paws are lame.
Goodness (n.) in the good and the just is the greatest danger to humanity's future — whatever harm the evil do, the harm of the good is the most harmful harm.
Goodness (n.) depends on evil: one is good on condition one also knows how to be evil; one is evil because otherwise one would not understand how to be good.
Goodness (n.) works strongest in ages when tragedy walks abroad: the shepherd's song, the idyl, the "good man" fascinate precisely the most robust men.
Goodness (n.) in high degree presupposes spiritual myopia and coarseness — and the highest goodness with the highest power would be a calamity: "the abolition of evil."
Goodness (n.) often lies concealed, a priceless golden drop, in the worst, most malignant, hardest men — outweighing all the benevolence of milk souls.
Goodness (n.) in any high degree presupposes intellectual myopia — and joined to highest power, it would entail the most disastrous consequence: the abolition of evil.