The Subject (n.) is a grammatically induced illusion. Just because there is thinking does not mean there is something or someone that thinks. It is a mere effect of our grammatical customs which add a doer to every deed.
The Subject (n.) is a wrongheaded notion that leads us to wrongly believe in substance. If we relinquish the subject, the substance also disappears and we acquire 'degrees of being' in place of that which has being.
The Subject (n.) is an illusion, belying the fact that there is no being beyond doing.
The Subject (n.) is an illusory distinction drawn between a doer who effects and a deed that is effected. By and by, this relationship will be conceived ever more subtly until finally it can be left behind.
The Subject (n.) is merely a fiction added to the deed ' The deed is everything.
The Subject (n.) is not something given, it is something added and invented and projected behind what there is.Finally, is it necessary to posit an interpreter behind the interpretation'.
The Subject (n.) is the entire unruly crowd of subjective passions and striving of his will aiming at something particular, which seems real to him.
The Subject (n.) is the fiction that many similar states in us are the effect of one substratum.
A Subject (n.) is a changeling smuggled in by grammar — like the atom or the thing-in-itself — and the vengeful cling to it because it lets them hold the bird of prey accountable for being a bird of prey.
A Subject (n.) is only a fiction: the ego one censures when one censures egoism does not exist at all.
The Subject (n.) the idea that an object seen from within would be a subject is a well-meant invention that has had its day; consciousness is a nook-perspective set by coarse utility.
A Subject (n.) is not something given but something added, invented and projected behind what there is; even an interpreter behind the interpretation is invention.
A Subject (n.) is the fiction that many similar states in us are the effect of one substratum — but it was we who first made them similar.
A Subject (n.) is no atom: its sphere grows and shrinks, its center shifts; it splits when it cannot organize its mass, or makes a weaker subject its functionary — it wants not to preserve itself but to surpass itself.
A Subject (n.) may be a multiplicity — an aristocracy of "cells" used to ruling jointly, whose interaction and struggle is the basis of our thought.
A Subject (n.) is invented out of happiness: we want every good that befalls us to have been done to us, so we seek a doer to praise.
A Subject (n.) is a ruler at the head of a commonwealth, dependent on the ruled — and a certain ignorance of what its subjects do is a condition of its ruling at all.
A Subject (n.) was a clever feat: turning one perspective in seeing into the cause of seeing as such.
A Subject (n.) is no atom: its sphere constantly grows and shrinks, its centre shifts; if it cannot organise what it has appropriated it splits in two — it wants not to preserve but to surpass itself.
A Subject (n.) is the fiction that many like states in us are effects of one substratum — but we made them alike in the first place.