Nature (n.) is an open-ended struggle, with nothing superior at all emerging. In most cases the strong perish.
Nature (n.) is an undivided and indivisible fluidity, a continuous flux, a continuous, homogeneous, undivided, indivisible flowing.
Nature (n.) is at once chaos and necessity... it is profuse, luxuriant, teeming with excess and superabundance while also also cold, exact, bound to its sempiternal rhythms. It is finite in terms of its quantity of matter, energy, or force but infinite in that it operates dynamically in an infinite time.
Nature (n.) is not order and harmony but rather chaos and struggle.
Nature (n.) is not so much governed by immutable laws as it is a kind of regularity characterized by a constancy of the domination of stronger wills over weaker ones'.
Nature (n.) is pleasurable to be in because it has no opinions about us.
Nature (n.) is something entirely different from what comes to mind when we invoke its name.
Nature (n.) is a thing we are so fond of being out among because it has no opinions about us.
Nature (n.) is supremely indifferent. Strong and weak wills both perish at random, and nature is oblivious to the outcome of any form of 'struggle'.
Nature (n.) needs knowledge and is terrified of the knowledge it needs; so the flame flickers restlessly back and forth, seizing a thousand things before the one for which nature needs knowledge at all.
Nature (n.) has done badly: the young should see themselves as its failed work, and also as witness to the artist's grand intentions — I will honour its intentions by serving it so that one day it may do better.
Nature (n.) is melancholy because it wants to be universally useful and does not know how to find the means: it propels the philosopher into mankind like an arrow, takes no aim, and hopes it will stick somewhere.
Nature (n.) squanders not through wanton luxury but through inexperience; if it were human it would never cease to be annoyed at its own ineptitude.
Nature (n.) is a bad economist: its expenditure far exceeds its income, and all its wealth notwithstanding it is bound sooner or later to ruin itself.
Nature (n.) surprised naked by the artist's clear and loving glance conceals her shame by fleeing into her antitheses — the invisible becomes visible, the visible flees into sound; by hiding herself she reveals herself.
Nature (n.) desires transformation through love, while unnature, become aware of itself, can only long for nothingness — the one wants to be different, the other wants not to be.
Nature (n.) turns bad when men call it bad and then always find it so — this makes them worse than they need be; the suffering is groundless, a consequence only of opinions about things.
Nature (n.) loved idyllically says nothing of a man's character — Horace put the tenderest feeling for country life in the mouth of a Roman usurer.
Nature (n.) is something quite different from what we think when we say its name — because we forget to include ourselves.
Nature (n.) was first 'evil' because men imagined themselves into it; then, in Rousseau's age, 'good' because they were so fed up with one another they needed a corner of the world man could not enter.