Marriage (n.) is no objection to marriage but to modernity.
Marriage (n.) is proven by its ability to tolerate an occasional exception.
Marriage (n.) is unhappy not when there is a lack of love, but a lack of friendship.
Marriage (n.) is made in error when done out of love. Such marriages have error as their father and misery as their mother.
Marriage (n.) is maintained by mystery. One should never know too precisely whom one has married.
Marriage (n.) is the will of two to create the one who is more than those who created it.
Marriage (n.) would be good more often if married couples did not live together.
Marriage (n.) is a long conversation: ask whether you will enjoy talking with this person into old age — everything else is transitory.
Marriage (n.) is a pious fraud that ennobled love: by stubbornly believing a passion could endure for life, despite constant refutation, it raised love to a higher rank.
Marriage (n.) is the will of two to create the one who is more than those who created it.
Marriage (n.) as the superfluous practise it is poverty of the soul by two, filth of the soul by two, pitiful contentment by two.
Marriage (n.) is where the hero who went seeking truths finally bags himself a little dressed-up lie.
Marriage (n.) puts an end to many brief follies — as one long stupidity.
Marriage (n.) that is mismatched makes the worst of the vengeful: such couples take it out on the whole world that they are no longer single.
Marriage (n.) in the bourgeois sense is a matter neither of love nor of money but of society's permission for two people to gratify their sexual desires with one another — no institution can be founded on love.
Marriage (n.) in the bourgeois sense has nothing to do with love — no institution can be made from love — but is society's permission for two people to satisfy their desires with each other.